Approach
Four decisions you will either agree with or reject immediately.
These are the opinions the product is built on, stated plainly so you can rule us out fast if you disagree.
Why it is different
Four decisions you will either agree with or reject immediately.
These are the opinions the product is built on. They are stated plainly so you can rule us out fast if you disagree.
Every risk score is arguable. Scoring returns each factor, its multiplier and a sentence justifying it — never a bare number. An analyst who cannot challenge a score will not trust it, and a score nobody trusts changes no behaviour.
Context outranks scanner severity. A MEDIUM check on an internet-facing crown-jewel asset inside an attack path becomes CRITICAL. A HIGH on an isolated dev box drops to MEDIUM. The original severity stays visible next to the new one, shown as a movement rather than a verdict: HIGH↑CRITICAL
Exposure needs two things. A public IP is not reachability — a security group must also admit the traffic. Reporting otherwise is the false positive that makes people stop trusting a CNAPP, and we would rather under-report than train you to ignore us.
Nobody declares a fix. A human cannot set a finding to RESOLVED — only a re-scan confirms remediation. Accepting a risk requires an exception with an expiry date, because an exception without one is a permanent hole with good paperwork.
Outcomes
What changes in the week after you connect.
A platform is only worth the behaviour it changes. These are the five things a team notices first.
You know what you have
Inventory walks compute, network, identity and data, recording not just what exists but how each thing is reachable and what it is worth.
The list gets shorter
Findings are rescored against real context, so the work that reaches the top is the work that closes a route — not the work that happened to be graded HIGH in isolation.
Fewer false alarms
Exposure requires a public address and a security group that admits the traffic. Under-reporting beats training a team to ignore the tool.
Audit stops being a project
The scan that builds your attack paths produces framework coverage, so posture and evidence never disagree with each other.
Nothing new to run
One read-only role, no agents, no collector in the path of your production traffic, and nothing to patch.
We are taking on a small number of design partners.
Early AWS teams who will point Defyve at a real account, tell us where it is wrong, and get the roadmap bent towards their estate. Hands-on onboarding, direct line to the people building it, and pricing that reflects the stage we are at.